Triple
T32453982
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Monna Innominata |
E829370
|
entity |
| Predicate | parodiesOrRevises |
P152719
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Petrarchan conventions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Petrarchan conventions | Statement: [Monna Innominata, parodiesOrRevises, Petrarchan conventions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: parodiesOrRevises Context triple: [Monna Innominata, parodiesOrRevises, Petrarchan conventions]
-
A.
parodies
Indicates that one entity imitates another in an exaggerated or humorous way, often to criticize or comment on the original.
-
B.
conflictsWithParodies
Indicates that one entity is in conflict with another entity specifically in the context of parody, such as opposing, contradicting, or undermining the other through parody.
-
C.
originalSongwriterParodied
Indicates that one entity is the songwriter of an original song that is parodied by another entity.
-
D.
satirizedBy
Indicates that the subject is the target or object of satire created or performed by the specified entity.
-
E.
narrativeEraParodied
chosen
Indicates that one narrative work humorously imitates or satirizes the style, conventions, or characteristics of a particular narrative era.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3491df9288190afc0b23b1d6e72ce |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c3147ff88190bb4108e817e4eeb1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6ba700a708190ab6db62791e43774 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:01 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:56 a.m.