Triple

T32424111
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Spree-Neiße E828528 entity
Predicate hasMinorityPeople P186141 FINISHED
Object Sorbs NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sorbs | Statement: [Spree-Neiße, hasMinorityPeople, Sorbs]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMinorityPeople
Context triple: [Spree-Neiße, hasMinorityPeople, Sorbs]
  • A. hasMinorityIn
    Indicates that one entity holds a non-controlling, minority ownership or stake in another entity.
  • B. hadMinorityPopulation chosen
    Indicates that an entity possessed or contained a population that was in the minority relative to the total population.
  • C. hasMinorityInHouse
    Indicates that a political party or group holds fewer seats than any other in a legislative house, making it the smallest (minority) faction there.
  • D. hasMinorityStatusInMostCountries
    Indicates that the subject group is considered a minority population in the majority of countries worldwide.
  • E. isConsideredMinorityStronghold
    Indicates that a place or region is widely regarded as having a strong, concentrated presence or influence of a particular minority group.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3491b28bc8190b75cea7a507f337b completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fb3425666081908916fcbf3b5dd907 completed May 6, 2026, 12:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fb2f5f3164819099429c2cc3d24e01 completed May 6, 2026, 12:09 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:54 a.m.