Triple
T32419383
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fat Gang or No Gang |
E828409
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMusicalRoleOfCreator |
P193257
|
FINISHED |
| Object | producer |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: producer | Statement: [Fat Gang or No Gang, hasMusicalRoleOfCreator, producer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMusicalRoleOfCreator Context triple: [Fat Gang or No Gang, hasMusicalRoleOfCreator, producer]
-
A.
hasMusicalArtistRoleOfCreator
Indicates that the specified musical artist serves as the creator (e.g., composer, originator) of the referenced musical work or content.
-
B.
hasMusicalComposer
Indicates that one entity serves as the musical composer responsible for creating the music associated with another entity.
-
C.
creatorRoleOfComposer
Indicates that an entity serves in the role of composer as the creator of another entity.
-
D.
hasMusicalWorkType
Indicates that a musical work is associated with a specific type or category of musical composition.
-
E.
hasArtistRole
Indicates that an entity serves in the capacity or role of an artist in relation to another entity or context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3491b28bc8190b75cea7a507f337b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd3d46d1f48190a1b20dd063224b7d |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd3ae1510c81908fe1280efc17feee |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:22 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd3d45ccb8819082f15e60bd33afc9 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:54 a.m.