Triple

T32410942
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Raymond Leo Burke E828216 entity
Predicate stanceOnLiturgy P70219 FINISHED
Object support for traditional Latin liturgy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: support for traditional Latin liturgy | Statement: [Raymond Leo Burke, stanceOnLiturgy, support for traditional Latin liturgy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: stanceOnLiturgy
Context triple: [Raymond Leo Burke, stanceOnLiturgy, support for traditional Latin liturgy]
  • A. usesAlsoLiturgy
    Indicates that an entity additionally employs or follows a particular liturgy alongside its primary or other liturgical practices.
  • B. positionOnLiturgy chosen
    Indicates the stance or viewpoint an entity holds regarding liturgical practices, forms, or regulations.
  • C. liturgicalUsage
    Indicates how something is used, practiced, or functions within a specific liturgical or worship context.
  • D. usedInLiturgy
    Indicates that something is employed or incorporated as part of a formal religious liturgy or worship service.
  • E. liturgicalSetting
    Indicates the specific religious or worship context in which a liturgical text, action, or element is intended to be used.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34919f300819092b541c6277cd68a completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6c256953c8190b5bfa53cf67d79c2 completed May 3, 2026, 3:34 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6ba6eb32c8190bf405b2011fa48f7 completed May 3, 2026, 3:01 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:53 a.m.