Triple
T32410631
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John Emerson |
E828208
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusInDredScottCase |
P198463
|
FINISHED |
| Object | former enslaver of the plaintiff |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: former enslaver of the plaintiff | Statement: [John Emerson, legalStatusInDredScottCase, former enslaver of the plaintiff]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusInDredScottCase Context triple: [John Emerson, legalStatusInDredScottCase, former enslaver of the plaintiff]
-
A.
stateOfLegalCase
Indicates the current procedural or legal status that a particular legal case is in within the justice system.
-
B.
lawsuitRelatedSupremeCourtHolding
Indicates that the lawsuit is connected to, influenced by, or governed by a specific holding or decision of the Supreme Court.
-
C.
legalStatusAffirmedIn
Indicates that an entity’s legal status has been formally confirmed or upheld within a specified legal jurisdiction, document, or proceeding.
-
D.
supremeCourtHolding
Indicates that a decision or legal principle has been formally established by a supreme court as the authoritative resolution of a legal issue.
-
E.
judicialStatus
Indicates the legal or court-related condition or standing of an entity within a judicial process (e.g., pending, decided, appealed).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34919f300819092b541c6277cd68a |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fee691952c8190822da83e46311d1d |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fee62f285c8190a625562a9b80526e |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:45 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fee690af688190a845310f102a0c83 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:53 a.m.