Triple
T32407771
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Government of the Caribbean Netherlands |
E828128
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasUniqueStatusSince |
P186482
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2010-10-10 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2010-10-10 | Statement: [Government of the Caribbean Netherlands, hasUniqueStatusSince, 2010-10-10]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUniqueStatusSince Context triple: [Government of the Caribbean Netherlands, hasUniqueStatusSince, 2010-10-10]
-
A.
hasUniqueStatus
Indicates that an entity possesses a status or condition that is distinct and not shared with any other entity in the given context.
-
B.
currentStatusSince
Indicates the point in time since which an entity has held its current status or state.
-
C.
hasHistorySince
Indicates that an entity has maintained a particular state, condition, or relationship continuously starting from a specified point in time.
-
D.
hasIdentityStatus
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular identity-related state or condition (such as confirmed, provisional, or unknown).
-
E.
hasAdministrativeStatusSince
Indicates that an entity has held a particular administrative status continuously from a specified point in time onward.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34919f300819092b541c6277cd68a |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f9fe1a1ca4819084c196f0041f0be2 |
completed | May 5, 2026, 2:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7cf769338819092a5f42653dcc956 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:43 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f9fd66eed48190bdc26a8def328c2d |
completed | May 5, 2026, 2:23 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:53 a.m.