Triple
T3240223
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Elaine Benes |
E67947
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipWithJerrySeinfeld |
P38921
|
FINISHED |
| Object | close friend |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: close friend | Statement: [Elaine Benes, relationshipWithJerrySeinfeld, close friend]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipWithJerrySeinfeld Context triple: [Elaine Benes, relationshipWithJerrySeinfeld, close friend]
-
A.
relationshipToCharacter
chosen
Indicates the specific type of personal, social, or narrative connection that one entity has to a given character.
-
B.
relationshipToLaurie
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Laurie.
-
C.
relationshipType
Indicates the specific kind of relationship that exists between two or more entities.
-
D.
hasProtagonistRelationship
Indicates that there exists a central, story-driving relationship involving the protagonist and another entity within a narrative.
-
E.
termRelationTo
Indicates a general relational association between one term and another, without specifying the exact nature of that relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad858d27348190abb61c280b4c86a9 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adaef6430081909084589f6eea5c7e |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ada4159e0481908cbbdd750f5e08c7 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:08 p.m.