Triple
T32401644
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | American (in-universe) |
E827966
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeContradictedBy |
P113448
|
FINISHED |
| Object | retcons in the series canon |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: retcons in the series canon | Statement: [American (in-universe), canBeContradictedBy, retcons in the series canon]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeContradictedBy Context triple: [American (in-universe), canBeContradictedBy, retcons in the series canon]
-
A.
canBeChallengedOn
Indicates that one entity’s claim, decision, or status is open to being questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another entity.
-
B.
allegedInconsistencyWith
chosen
Indicates a claimed or suspected contradiction or mismatch between one thing and another.
-
C.
consistentWith
Indicates that one entity does not contradict and is compatible or in agreement with another entity, condition, or set of constraints.
-
D.
canBeFromOpposition
Indicates that an entity may originate from, belong to, or be associated with an opposing side or group.
-
E.
contradictedTheory
Indicates that one entity has presented evidence, arguments, or findings that oppose, challenge, or invalidate the theory proposed by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34919342c8190a4c3bf35a90d4e58 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe031bc6208190860099aef72d8dcb |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe014c8b388190b5d4e0cb95ee2be5 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:52 a.m.