Triple

T32387719
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject UK Indo-Pacific tilt E827583 entity
Predicate securityArrangementPartner P184401 FINISHED
Object Australia NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Australia | Statement: [UK Indo-Pacific tilt, securityArrangementPartner, Australia]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityArrangementPartner
Context triple: [UK Indo-Pacific tilt, securityArrangementPartner, Australia]
  • A. securityArrangementsBy
    Indicates that one entity is responsible for providing, organizing, or overseeing security arrangements for another entity or situation.
  • B. securityArrangements
    Indicates the existence, nature, or details of protective measures or safeguards established between or around entities.
  • C. securityPillar
    Indicates that one entity functions as a foundational security pillar or core security domain in relation to another entity.
  • D. securityRepresents
    Indicates that one entity serves as a representation, symbol, or embodiment of another in a security-related context (such as credentials, tokens, or certificates standing in for an identity or resource).
  • E. securityCooperationFormat
    Indicates the type or structure of collaborative security arrangements or mechanisms established between entities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349184e7481909c6c54428cb9cf12 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7b0e5744c8190a22c1e1d6fcfa466 completed May 3, 2026, 8:32 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7ab70d034819080295628497d8582 completed May 3, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f7b0e3917481908a394680d76743c3 completed May 3, 2026, 8:32 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:51 a.m.