Triple
T32387255
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | COSCO-HIT Terminals |
E827574
|
entity |
| Predicate | formedAsJointVentureBetween |
P26627
|
FINISHED |
| Object | COSCO Shipping Ports |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: COSCO Shipping Ports | Statement: [COSCO-HIT Terminals, formedAsJointVentureBetween, COSCO Shipping Ports]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formedAsJointVentureBetween Context triple: [COSCO-HIT Terminals, formedAsJointVentureBetween, COSCO Shipping Ports]
-
A.
formerJointVentureWith
Indicates that two entities were previously engaged together in a joint venture relationship that has since ended.
-
B.
hasJointVenture
chosen
Indicates that two or more entities are engaged together in a formally established joint business venture or collaborative commercial undertaking.
-
C.
formedAsPartnershipBetween
Indicates that something was created or established through a formal partnership between two or more entities.
-
D.
hasJointVenturePartner
Indicates that an entity is engaged in a joint venture relationship with another entity as a formal business partner.
-
E.
formedJointCommitteeWith
Indicates that two or more entities collaborated to create and participate in a shared joint committee.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349184e7481909c6c54428cb9cf12 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff79e7206c8190a809b5f2a6261378 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff798356b881908645074fb3a96517 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:14 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:51 a.m.