Triple
T32378558
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hubs API |
E827350
|
entity |
| Predicate | clientSideLibrary |
P81836
|
FINISHED |
| Object | JavaScript SignalR client |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: JavaScript SignalR client | Statement: [Hubs API, clientSideLibrary, JavaScript SignalR client]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: clientSideLibrary Context triple: [Hubs API, clientSideLibrary, JavaScript SignalR client]
-
A.
clientSideLanguage
Indicates that a particular programming or scripting language is executed on the client side (typically in the user's browser) rather than on the server.
-
B.
clientSDKPlatform
Indicates the software platform or environment on which a client-side SDK is designed to run or be used.
-
C.
supportsLanguageClientLibrary
chosen
Indicates that an entity provides or is compatible with a client library for interacting with a specific programming language.
-
D.
implementedInLibrary
Indicates that a particular functionality, feature, or component is realized and provided within a specific software library.
-
E.
clientOf
Indicates that one entity receives services or conducts business from another entity in a client–provider relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349177ddc8190ab0583f05597056b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c8159edc8190b1c87015e0c820e8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6c3f42fbc8190a06eb1044c9e6094 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:51 a.m.