Triple

T32359484
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Wari provincial administration E826819 entity
Predicate hadProvincialExample P174185 FINISHED
Object Pikillaqta NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pikillaqta | Statement: [Wari provincial administration, hadProvincialExample, Pikillaqta]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hadProvincialExample
Context triple: [Wari provincial administration, hadProvincialExample, Pikillaqta]
  • A. hadProvince
    Indicates that a governing entity possessed administrative control or jurisdiction over a specific province.
  • B. isProvincial
    Indicates that something belongs to, is characteristic of, or is administered at the level of a province rather than a national or local level.
  • C. previousProvince
    Indicates that one province was the immediately preceding administrative region of another in a temporal or historical sequence.
  • D. laterProvince
    Indicates that one administrative region or province succeeds another in time, coming into existence or effect after the other.
  • E. affectedProvince
    Indicates that a particular province is impacted or influenced by a specified event, action, or condition.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34915a2588190bb3178f5ec2f48f4 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6be93bb548190880e9671c1dd0f29 completed May 3, 2026, 3:18 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6ba6cef208190bc5cd43d96127004 completed May 3, 2026, 3:01 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6bbbe23d48190b2aa662d69b41900 completed May 3, 2026, 3:06 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:49 a.m.