Triple
T32317534
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ager Setinus |
E825680
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasToponymicAdjective |
P9174
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Setinus |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Setinus | Statement: [Ager Setinus, hasToponymicAdjective, Setinus]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasToponymicAdjective Context triple: [Ager Setinus, hasToponymicAdjective, Setinus]
-
A.
hasToponymicForm
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a toponymic (place-name-based) form or variant derived from another entity.
-
B.
hasToponymicQualifier
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific place-related qualifier (toponym) used to distinguish it from other, similarly named entities.
-
C.
hasToponymicFeature
Indicates that an entity is associated with or characterized by a specific geographic or place-related feature (toponym).
-
D.
hasToponymy
Indicates a relationship where one entity possesses or is associated with the system, study, or set of place names (toponyms) of another entity.
-
E.
isToponymic
Indicates that something is related to or derived from a place name (a toponym).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3491213b88190a57094d8697a7455 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fbbc49da8c8190902bbb05d2477cab |
completed | May 6, 2026, 10:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fbb13f34b08190bbbb220ac1e6e666 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 9:23 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:46 a.m.