Triple

T32307948
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Additional Protocol providing for a system of collective complaints E825417 entity
Predicate treatySeries P33308 FINISHED
Object ETS No. 158 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ETS No. 158 | Statement: [Additional Protocol providing for a system of collective complaints, treatySeries, ETS No. 158]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: treatySeries
Context triple: [Additional Protocol providing for a system of collective complaints, treatySeries, ETS No. 158]
  • A. resultOfTreaties
    Indicates that something exists, occurs, or holds true as a consequence or outcome of one or more treaties.
  • B. historicalTreaty
    Indicates that a formal agreement or pact was established between entities at some point in the past.
  • C. treatyOf
    Indicates a formal agreement or pact established between entities, typically states or organizations, defining their mutual obligations or terms.
  • D. treatyFocus chosen
    Indicates that a treaty is primarily concerned with, directed toward, or centered on a particular subject, issue, or area.
  • E. treatyFamily
    Indicates that there exists a familial or kinship-based treaty or formal agreement relationship between the entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3491213b88190a57094d8697a7455 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6fb19063c81909466b329655c8583 completed May 3, 2026, 7:36 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6f96badb08190994442c2aba840b1 completed May 3, 2026, 7:29 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:45 a.m.