Triple
T32306190
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mingun Pahtodawgyi |
E825376
|
entity |
| Predicate | wouldHaveBeen |
P173946
|
FINISHED |
| Object | one of the largest stupas in the world if completed |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: one of the largest stupas in the world if completed | Statement: [Mingun Pahtodawgyi, wouldHaveBeen, one of the largest stupas in the world if completed]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wouldHaveBeen Context triple: [Mingun Pahtodawgyi, wouldHaveBeen, one of the largest stupas in the world if completed]
-
A.
wouldHaveBeenStyle
Indicates a hypothetical or counterfactual stylistic relationship, describing how something’s style would have been under different circumstances.
-
B.
wouldHaveEstablished
Indicates a hypothetical or counterfactual situation in which an entity was expected or intended to establish something (such as a state, condition, or relationship) but did not actually do so.
-
C.
wouldHaveHadMembers
Indicates a hypothetical or counterfactual relationship in which an entity, under certain conditions or in an unrealized scenario, would have included specific members.
-
D.
wouldHaveBeenCreatedBy
Indicates that an entity is hypothesized or counterfactually assumed to have been brought into existence by a particular agent or creator under certain conditions.
-
E.
wouldHaveGuaranteed
Indicates that one entity’s action, condition, or provision would have ensured a particular outcome or protection for another entity, had the relevant circumstances occurred.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349115304819084ee91d345b6c8aa |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6bd81235081908c0748dfd5db5039 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b632cf788190a3d0c08cd026b84b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6b960ca4081909a77690c2b122f5e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:45 a.m.