Triple

T32297878
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jupiter Pluvius E825152 entity
Predicate hasEtymologyPart P124938 FINISHED
Object Jupiter from *Iuppiter* LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jupiter from *Iuppiter* | Statement: [Jupiter Pluvius, hasEtymologyPart, Jupiter from *Iuppiter*]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEtymologyPart
Context triple: [Jupiter Pluvius, hasEtymologyPart, Jupiter from *Iuppiter*]
  • A. hasEtymologyConcept
    Indicates that something derives its origin, form, or meaning from a particular etymological concept or source.
  • B. hasEtymologyDetail
    Indicates a relationship where additional explanatory or contextual information about the origin or derivation of a term is provided.
  • C. hasEtymologicalBasis chosen
    Indicates that one term, name, or expression is derived from, based on, or historically formed from the other in terms of linguistic origin.
  • D. etymologyStatus
    Indicates the status or reliability classification of an etymological explanation for a term or name.
  • E. etymologyType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of etymological relationship that links a term to its linguistic origin or source.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349115304819084ee91d345b6c8aa completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f78fd5a6388190bfda4bbb2e222e5b completed May 3, 2026, 6:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f78e2ac3fc819081a45c6841375c8d completed May 3, 2026, 6:04 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:44 a.m.