Triple

T32272654
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mexican federal system E824454 entity
Predicate limitsStatePowers P84181 FINISHED
Object supremacy of the federal constitution LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: supremacy of the federal constitution | Statement: [Mexican federal system, limitsStatePowers, supremacy of the federal constitution]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: limitsStatePowers
Context triple: [Mexican federal system, limitsStatePowers, supremacy of the federal constitution]
  • A. hasStatePowers
    Indicates that an entity possesses or exercises the official powers or authorities of a state-level government.
  • B. legislativePowerScope
    Indicates the range or extent of authority that a legislative body has to create, amend, or repeal laws.
  • C. limitsPresidentialAuthority
    Indicates that something imposes constraints or restrictions on the scope or exercise of presidential powers.
  • D. restrictsPowerOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity limits, constrains, or reduces the authority, control, or influence that another entity can exercise.
  • E. heldFederalPowerFrom
    Indicates that one entity exercised official authority or governing control at the federal level during a specified time period or under specified conditions, originating from another entity or source.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3490e73588190915f282edd105772 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6bc8d0ecc8190b33b0e37bd0d443e completed May 3, 2026, 3:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6b632cf788190a3d0c08cd026b84b completed May 3, 2026, 2:42 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:42 a.m.