Triple
T32272650
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mexican federal system |
E824454
|
entity |
| Predicate | languageOfConstitution |
P27356
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Spanish |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Spanish | Statement: [Mexican federal system, languageOfConstitution, Spanish]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageOfConstitution Context triple: [Mexican federal system, languageOfConstitution, Spanish]
-
A.
languageOfConstitutionAtIssue
Indicates that the specified language is the language in which the constitution relevant to the case or issue is written or officially formulated.
-
B.
languageOfOriginalPromulgation
chosen
Indicates the language in which a law, regulation, or official text was originally formally issued or published.
-
C.
languageOfPromulgation
Indicates the language in which a law, decree, or official act is formally issued or proclaimed.
-
D.
languageOfFounders
Indicates the language or languages spoken or used by the founders of an entity.
-
E.
constitutionalLanguageGroup
Indicates that a group is officially recognized or defined as a language group within a constitution or constitutional framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490e73588190915f282edd105772 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ffc89596d08190b97bd60b45c7f9c0 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ffc81ba5dc8190ae94d44e2284948f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:49 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:42 a.m.