Triple

T32267260
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Isabelle/ZF E824318 entity
Predicate maintainedWith P183139 FINISHED
Object Isabelle distribution LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Isabelle distribution | Statement: [Isabelle/ZF, maintainedWith, Isabelle distribution]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: maintainedWith
Context triple: [Isabelle/ZF, maintainedWith, Isabelle distribution]
  • A. maintainedAs
    Indicates that one entity is kept in a particular state, condition, or configuration by another entity through ongoing care, management, or support.
  • B. legacyMaintainedBy
    Indicates that responsibility for preserving, continuing, or upholding a legacy rests with a particular entity.
  • C. maintainedFor
    Indicates that something is kept in a particular state, condition, or operation for the benefit, use, or purpose of another entity.
  • D. oftenMaintainedBy
    Indicates that something is regularly or frequently kept in working order, cared for, or updated by a particular agent or entity.
  • E. stillMaintained
    Indicates that the subject continues to be actively maintained or supported over time.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3490e73588190915f282edd105772 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f798387ea481909f51303f53a22e52 completed May 3, 2026, 6:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7961550f88190b7bb8a9155458b54 completed May 3, 2026, 6:38 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f79798663481908d6bc48dd6a94ca6 completed May 3, 2026, 6:44 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:42 a.m.