Triple
T32253505
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Forensic Services (Detroit Police Department) |
E823943
|
entity |
| Predicate | handlesEvidenceType |
P172641
|
FINISHED |
| Object | fingerprints |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fingerprints | Statement: [Forensic Services (Detroit Police Department), handlesEvidenceType, fingerprints]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: handlesEvidenceType Context triple: [Forensic Services (Detroit Police Department), handlesEvidenceType, fingerprints]
-
A.
evidenceTypeHandled
chosen
Indicates that an entity is responsible for processing or managing a particular type or category of evidence.
-
B.
evidenceHandling
Indicates how evidence is collected, processed, stored, and transferred within an investigation or legal context.
-
C.
usedEvidenceType
Indicates that a particular type or category of evidence was employed or relied upon in a given context or activity.
-
D.
hasEvidenceItem
Indicates that there exists a specific piece of evidence supporting, illustrating, or justifying the associated entity or claim.
-
E.
hasProcessEvidence
Indicates that there is supporting evidence for a process or procedure associated with the subject in relation to the object.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490db0748190bfef6e50c95d39d3 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6ffbad8848190867c2988c0ceb84f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6fc5740fc81909774a4f65201a3ff |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:42 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:41 a.m.