Triple
T322420
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | TMS |
E6441
|
entity |
| Predicate | requiredBy |
P11424
|
FINISHED |
| Object | IEEE 1149.1 compliant devices |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: IEEE 1149.1 compliant devices | Statement: [TMS, requiredBy, IEEE 1149.1 compliant devices]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requiredBy Context triple: [TMS, requiredBy, IEEE 1149.1 compliant devices]
-
A.
requires
Indicates that one entity must exist, occur, or be satisfied before another entity can exist, occur, or be carried out.
-
B.
requiresPermitFor
Indicates that one entity must obtain formal permission or authorization before performing an action involving another entity.
-
C.
isNotRequiredFor
Indicates that one entity is not necessary or mandatory for the existence, occurrence, validity, or completion of another entity or process.
-
D.
forcedBy
Indicates that an entity is compelled or coerced into an action or state by another entity.
-
E.
requiresShowing
Indicates that one entity must be displayed or made visible as a prerequisite or condition for another entity, action, or state.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7933d6c8190bb2592ad13286ef2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ea81a1e88190b3496070eb3d85f5 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e948048c819098ba4de9261ef2ef |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ea09a5e881908b313cb37409a4f9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.