Triple

T322193
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject IFC E6436 entity
Predicate communicationModelRole P11418 FINISHED
Object out-of-band control separate from data lines LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: out-of-band control separate from data lines | Statement: [IFC, communicationModelRole, out-of-band control separate from data lines]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: communicationModelRole
Context triple: [IFC, communicationModelRole, out-of-band control separate from data lines]
  • A. communicationMode
    Indicates the method or channel through which communication between entities is carried out.
  • B. communicationChannel
    Indicates a medium or method through which information is transmitted between parties.
  • C. roleInDialogue
    Indicates that an entity participates in a dialogue with a specific conversational role (e.g., speaker, listener, moderator) relative to other participants.
  • D. typeOfRole
    Indicates that one entity specifies the kind or category of role that another entity holds or performs.
  • E. role
    Indicates the function, position, or responsibility that one entity holds in relation to another within a given context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7933d6c8190bb2592ad13286ef2 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ea81a1e88190b3496070eb3d85f5 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e948048c819098ba4de9261ef2ef completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2ea09a5e881908b313cb37409a4f9 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.