Triple

T322191
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject IFC E6436 entity
Predicate reliabilityRole P10377 FINISHED
Object recover bus from error conditions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: recover bus from error conditions | Statement: [IFC, reliabilityRole, recover bus from error conditions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reliabilityRole
Context triple: [IFC, reliabilityRole, recover bus from error conditions]
  • A. reliabilityMechanism chosen
    Indicates a mechanism or process that ensures the dependable, consistent, and correct functioning of a system or relationship.
  • B. typeOfRole
    Indicates that one entity specifies the kind or category of role that another entity holds or performs.
  • C. role
    Indicates the function, position, or responsibility that one entity holds in relation to another within a given context.
  • D. deFactoRole
    Indicates that an entity effectively functions in a role or capacity in practice, even if that role is not formally or officially assigned.
  • E. securityRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a specific security-related role, permission level, or access profile within a system or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7933d6c8190bb2592ad13286ef2 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ea81a1e88190b3496070eb3d85f5 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e948048c819098ba4de9261ef2ef completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.