Triple

T32210137
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Contra Severum E822775 entity
Predicate polemicAgainst P153879 FINISHED
Object teachings of Severus of Antioch LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: teachings of Severus of Antioch | Statement: [Contra Severum, polemicAgainst, teachings of Severus of Antioch]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: polemicAgainst
Context triple: [Contra Severum, polemicAgainst, teachings of Severus of Antioch]
  • A. opposition
    Indicates a relationship in which one entity actively resists, disagrees with, or is positioned against another entity, idea, or action.
  • B. controversy
    Indicates a situation in which there is active disagreement, dispute, or public debate between parties over a particular issue, action, or claim.
  • C. aimsToRefute chosen
    Indicates an intention or effort by one entity to disprove, counter, or invalidate a claim, argument, or position held by another entity.
  • D. ledAgainst
    Indicates that one entity directed or commanded an opposing effort, campaign, or force against another entity.
  • E. polarity
    Indicates whether the relationship or statement is affirmed (positive) or denied/opposed (negative).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3490a3bec819097bc58d4731b9d08 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6bb91c24481908bec766e2ed19345 completed May 3, 2026, 3:05 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6b6293188819080d5041ca0adb969 completed May 3, 2026, 2:42 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:37 a.m.