Triple
T32209894
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | King of the Visigoths |
E822768
|
entity |
| Predicate | couldConclude |
P173839
|
FINISHED |
| Object | treaties with the Roman Empire |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: treaties with the Roman Empire | Statement: [King of the Visigoths, couldConclude, treaties with the Roman Empire]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: couldConclude Context triple: [King of the Visigoths, couldConclude, treaties with the Roman Empire]
-
A.
canConclude
Indicates that one entity is able to logically derive or reach a conclusion about another entity or situation.
-
B.
mayConclude
Indicates that one party is permitted or authorized to bring a process, activity, or agreement to an end.
-
C.
canBeConcludedWith
Indicates that one situation, process, or sequence is able to be finished, resolved, or brought to an end by another specified action or condition.
-
D.
concludedThat
Indicates that one entity has reached or stated a judgment, inference, or decision about a proposition or situation involving another entity.
-
E.
could
Indicates that an entity had the ability, possibility, or permission to perform an action or for a situation to occur, typically in a past, hypothetical, or conditional context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490a3bec819097bc58d4731b9d08 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6bb91c24481908bec766e2ed19345 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b6293188819080d5041ca0adb969 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6b960ca4081909a77690c2b122f5e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:37 a.m.