Triple
T32204487
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Crimes Act 1961 (New Zealand) |
E822632
|
entity |
| Predicate | principalCriminalStatuteFor |
P35206
|
FINISHED |
| Object | New Zealand |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New Zealand | Statement: [Crimes Act 1961 (New Zealand), principalCriminalStatuteFor, New Zealand]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: principalCriminalStatuteFor Context triple: [Crimes Act 1961 (New Zealand), principalCriminalStatuteFor, New Zealand]
-
A.
mainCriminalCode
chosen
Indicates that one legal code is the primary or governing criminal code applicable to a given jurisdiction, case, or legal context.
-
B.
hasCriminalLawPrinciple
Indicates that there exists a criminal law doctrine, rule, or principle that applies to, governs, or characterizes the referenced entity or situation.
-
C.
statuteInvolved
Indicates that a particular statute or legal provision is implicated, referenced, or applied in relation to a given case, event, or legal matter.
-
D.
haveCriminalLaw
Indicates that an entity possesses, applies, or is governed by a system or body of criminal law.
-
E.
criminalType
Indicates the specific category or classification of crime associated with a criminal act or offender.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349093174819086e633c190a51aa8 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6bb3e928c819095aafcac5970e923 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b6293188819080d5041ca0adb969 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:42 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:36 a.m.