Triple
T32187391
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hinkley |
E822142
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalCaseLawFirm |
P8814
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Masry & Vititoe |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Masry & Vititoe | Statement: [Hinkley, legalCaseLawFirm, Masry & Vititoe]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCaseLawFirm Context triple: [Hinkley, legalCaseLawFirm, Masry & Vititoe]
-
A.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
B.
legalRepresentation
chosen
Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of another in legal matters, such as providing counsel, advocacy, or defense within a legal system.
-
C.
legalTool
Indicates a relationship where something functions as a legal instrument, mechanism, or means used to achieve or regulate a legal purpose or outcome.
-
D.
legalCodeFocus
Indicates that something is specifically concerned with, centered on, or primarily addressing a particular legal code or body of law.
-
E.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490819cc81909bae1f8ce99423c5 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fed357b2b4819084c709056a54461f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fed103d9cc81909b11619745110c61 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:35 a.m.