Triple
T32186016
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | OR-5 |
E822109
|
entity |
| Predicate | definesEquivalenceFor |
P154723
|
FINISHED |
| Object | pay grade comparison across NATO forces |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pay grade comparison across NATO forces | Statement: [OR-5, definesEquivalenceFor, pay grade comparison across NATO forces]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: definesEquivalenceFor Context triple: [OR-5, definesEquivalenceFor, pay grade comparison across NATO forces]
-
A.
hasEquivalenceRelation
Indicates that there exists an equivalence relation between the entities, meaning they are related in a way that is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
-
B.
equivalentTo
Indicates that two entities represent the same concept, value, or state, and can be treated as interchangeable in the given context.
-
C.
isEquiconsistentWith
Indicates that two formal theories or systems have the same consistency strength, such that if one is consistent then the other is also consistent, and if one is inconsistent then so is the other.
-
D.
hasEquivalenceClass
chosen
Indicates that something belongs to, or is associated with, a group of entities that are considered equivalent under a specified relation.
-
E.
legalEquivalence
Indicates that two legal entities, statuses, or provisions are considered to have the same legal effect, standing, or validity within a given legal framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490819cc81909bae1f8ce99423c5 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fda94697c4819081291967202248be |
completed | May 8, 2026, 9:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fda5973fcc8190a57daef31fb70a49 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 8:57 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:35 a.m.