Triple

T32183294
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Judiciary of Kentucky E822039 entity
Predicate hasTrialFunction P198629 FINISHED
Object fact-finding in legal disputes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fact-finding in legal disputes | Statement: [Judiciary of Kentucky, hasTrialFunction, fact-finding in legal disputes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTrialFunction
Context triple: [Judiciary of Kentucky, hasTrialFunction, fact-finding in legal disputes]
  • A. hasTrial
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific trial, such as a legal proceeding, clinical study, or experimental test.
  • B. hasTrialBy
    Indicates that a legal case, dispute, or matter is adjudicated or decided through a specified type of trial or judicial proceeding.
  • C. hasTrialLevel
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with a specific stage or level within a trial or experimental process.
  • D. hasFirstTrial
    Indicates that an entity is associated with its initial or earliest trial, test, or legal proceeding.
  • E. onTrialFor
    Indicates that a person is currently being legally prosecuted or judged in court for a specific alleged offense or charge.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3490755288190aee11740a34862f9 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fef8c3f2388190b995ec173512945a completed May 9, 2026, 9:05 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fef65975608190960b78d27e806d4f completed May 9, 2026, 8:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fef8c2cdd881908c6f44e4dfa5ffd0 completed May 9, 2026, 9:05 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:34 a.m.