Triple
T32152947
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. |
E821205
|
entity |
| Predicate | extendedDoctrineOf |
P173818
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Batson v. Kentucky |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Batson v. Kentucky | Statement: [J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., extendedDoctrineOf, Batson v. Kentucky]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: extendedDoctrineOf Context triple: [J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., extendedDoctrineOf, Batson v. Kentucky]
-
A.
developsDoctrineInLightOf
Indicates that an entity formulates or revises its doctrine taking into account, and in response to, another specified factor or context.
-
B.
clarifiedDoctrineOn
Indicates that one entity has provided a more precise, authoritative, or detailed explanation of a doctrine concerning another entity.
-
C.
doctrinalDomain
Indicates the specific area of doctrine or body of teachings within which a belief, statement, or rule is classified.
-
D.
levelOfDoctrine
Indicates the degree or stage of development, authority, or complexity associated with a particular doctrine within a given system or context.
-
E.
confirmedDoctrine
Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490520d081909b2f1271dab75faa |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6ba1733408190af579d93a7946508 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b6293188819080d5041ca0adb969 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6b960ca4081909a77690c2b122f5e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:32 a.m.