Triple
T32152850
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co. |
E821203
|
entity |
| Predicate | extendedRuleOf |
P66920
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Batson v. Kentucky |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Batson v. Kentucky | Statement: [Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., extendedRuleOf, Batson v. Kentucky]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: extendedRuleOf Context triple: [Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., extendedRuleOf, Batson v. Kentucky]
-
A.
expandedRuleTo
chosen
Indicates that one rule has been broadened, elaborated, or transformed into another, more detailed or extensive rule.
-
B.
expandedUnderRuleOf
Indicates that an entity grew, spread, or increased in scope during the period when another entity (typically a ruler, regime, or governing authority) was in power.
-
C.
endedContinuousRuleOf
Indicates that one entity brought an ongoing rule, regulation, or governing condition applied to another entity to an end.
-
D.
extendedIn
Indicates that one entity continues, prolongs, or expands the scope, duration, or range of another entity.
-
E.
extendedInCase
Indicates that one entity is lengthened, prolonged, or expanded when a particular condition or case applies.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490520d081909b2f1271dab75faa |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b9eccab88190a2895cbb0332c5a7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b3a970b0819090c6473844ffa8e3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:32 a.m.