Triple
T32152821
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Powers v. Ohio |
E821202
|
entity |
| Predicate | standingDoctrine |
P81434
|
FINISHED |
| Object | third-party standing for criminal defendants to assert jurors’ Equal Protection rights |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: third-party standing for criminal defendants to assert jurors’ Equal Protection rights | Statement: [Powers v. Ohio, standingDoctrine, third-party standing for criminal defendants to assert jurors’ Equal Protection rights]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: standingDoctrine Context triple: [Powers v. Ohio, standingDoctrine, third-party standing for criminal defendants to assert jurors’ Equal Protection rights]
-
A.
doctrineOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity is the doctrinal teaching, principle, or belief system associated with, derived from, or formally held by another entity.
-
B.
stateDoctrine
Indicates that a state or government officially endorses, promotes, or is guided by a particular doctrine, ideology, or set of principles.
-
C.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
D.
primaryDoctrine
Indicates that the object represents the main or foundational doctrine associated with the subject.
-
E.
standingBasis
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the foundational reason, justification, or basis for another entity’s standing, status, or position in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490520d081909b2f1271dab75faa |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f78fd5a6388190bfda4bbb2e222e5b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f78e2ac3fc819081a45c6841375c8d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:04 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:32 a.m.