Triple
T32152681
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Giles v. California |
E821199
|
entity |
| Predicate | pluralityJoinedInPartBy |
P77991
|
FINISHED |
| Object | David H. Souter |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: David H. Souter | Statement: [Giles v. California, pluralityJoinedInPartBy, David H. Souter]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: pluralityJoinedInPartBy Context triple: [Giles v. California, pluralityJoinedInPartBy, David H. Souter]
-
A.
joinedPluralityBy
Indicates that multiple entities collectively became members or participants of the same group, organization, or event through a shared act of joining.
-
B.
pluralityJoinedBy
Indicates that multiple entities are combined or grouped together into a single plural unit, typically linked by a coordinating connector (such as "and").
-
C.
joinedByInPart
Indicates that multiple entities are connected or associated together through a shared participation in a specific part or component of something.
-
D.
joinedByInJudgment
Indicates that one entity participates together with another entity in issuing or sharing a particular judgment or decision.
-
E.
pluralityOpinionJusticesJoining
chosen
Indicates that certain justices joined the opinion that received the largest number of supporting votes, forming the plurality in a court decision.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490520d081909b2f1271dab75faa |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b9eccab88190a2895cbb0332c5a7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b3a970b0819090c6473844ffa8e3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:32 a.m.