Triple

T32139427
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ASIC E820861 entity
Predicate commonHDL P7254 FINISHED
Object Verilog NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Verilog | Statement: [ASIC, commonHDL, Verilog]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commonHDL
Context triple: [ASIC, commonHDL, Verilog]
  • A. hardwareImplementation
    Indicates that one entity is realized, executed, or embodied as a physical hardware implementation of another (such as a design, specification, or abstract function).
  • B. hardwareDesign
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is responsible for creating, specifying, or engineering the physical components and architecture of another entity’s hardware system.
  • C. commonIn chosen
    Indicates that something frequently occurs, appears, or is found within a specified context, group, or environment.
  • D. commonStructure
    Indicates that two or more entities share the same or a very similar internal organization, pattern, or arrangement.
  • E. typicalCircuit
    Indicates that one entity is a standard or commonly occurring circuit configuration or pattern associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349039e0c819091c7a7d322e3f46d completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe38be079c8190a240191ac0e73e3a completed May 8, 2026, 7:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe350344508190930de2218156ca02 completed May 8, 2026, 7:09 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:30 a.m.