Triple
T32114614
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Radagast |
E820202
|
entity |
| Predicate | alignmentWithNature |
P173583
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Very strong |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Very strong | Statement: [Radagast, alignmentWithNature, Very strong]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alignmentWithNature Context triple: [Radagast, alignmentWithNature, Very strong]
-
A.
alignedWithPrinciple
Indicates that an entity’s behavior, decision, or state is consistent with and adheres to a specified principle or set of principles.
-
B.
alignmentWithLaw
Indicates the degree to which an action, policy, or entity conforms to or complies with applicable laws or legal standards.
-
C.
alignmentWithLeo
Indicates that an entity’s position, orientation, or behavior is aligned or in agreement with Leo.
-
D.
relatesToNatureOf
Indicates a general relationship that concerns or characterizes the inherent nature, essence, or fundamental qualities of something.
-
E.
alignmentConcept
Indicates a conceptual or abstract relationship of alignment or correspondence between entities, such as agreement, compatibility, or shared orientation in some dimension.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490209c881908ec0241476715f15 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b9075c308190bbc6f73f962ec221 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b3a970b0819090c6473844ffa8e3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:32 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6b49339048190b617a6749f648825 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:36 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:28 a.m.