Triple

T32111560
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Te Rūnanga-Ā-Iwi O Ngāpuhi E820129 entity
Predicate representsInTreatyMatters P5763 FINISHED
Object Ngāpuhi iwi NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ngāpuhi iwi | Statement: [Te Rūnanga-Ā-Iwi O Ngāpuhi, representsInTreatyMatters, Ngāpuhi iwi]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: representsInTreatyMatters
Context triple: [Te Rūnanga-Ā-Iwi O Ngāpuhi, representsInTreatyMatters, Ngāpuhi iwi]
  • A. roleInTreaties
    Indicates the specific capacity, function, or position an entity holds within the context of one or more treaties.
  • B. relatedToTreaty chosen
    Indicates that there exists a connection, association, or relevance between an entity and a specific treaty or treaties.
  • C. linkedToTreaty
    Indicates that an entity has a formal connection or association with a specific treaty, such as being established by, governed by, or otherwise related to that treaty.
  • D. treatyOrLegalIssue
    Indicates a formal agreement, dispute, or matter governed by treaties or legal frameworks between parties.
  • E. treatyMention
    Indicates that a treaty is referenced or mentioned in relation to the associated entities or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3490209c881908ec0241476715f15 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe779248c081909f0ed1a2a0df23db completed May 8, 2026, 11:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe76eaf6d48190998bc7168749cc42 completed May 8, 2026, 11:51 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:27 a.m.