Triple
T32111188
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ngāti Hau |
E820120
|
entity |
| Predicate | isSubTribeOf |
P29097
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ngāpuhi iwi |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ngāpuhi iwi | Statement: [Ngāti Hau, isSubTribeOf, Ngāpuhi iwi]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isSubTribeOf Context triple: [Ngāti Hau, isSubTribeOf, Ngāpuhi iwi]
-
A.
subTribeOf
chosen
Indicates that one tribe is a subordinate or constituent part of a larger, parent tribe.
-
B.
tribeProgenitorOf
Indicates that one entity is the original ancestor or founding progenitor from which a particular tribe or tribal group descends.
-
C.
hasNotableSubtribe
Indicates that an entity (typically a larger tribal or ethnic group) includes a particular subtribe that is especially recognized or notable.
-
D.
hasRelatedTribe
Indicates that one tribe is associated or connected to another tribe in some relevant way, such as by kinship, alliance, or shared characteristics.
-
E.
belongsToSubfamilyTribe
Indicates that one taxonomic group is a member of, or classified within, a specific subfamily or tribe.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490209c881908ec0241476715f15 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6f38159d08190980ad639e08f00f4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6e3d7bee48190b94e0beb48a1d7fa |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:27 a.m.