Triple
T32110073
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Runcorn F.C. Halton |
E820094
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasFanSuccessorClub |
P192850
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Runcorn Linnets F.C. |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Runcorn Linnets F.C. | Statement: [Runcorn F.C. Halton, hasFanSuccessorClub, Runcorn Linnets F.C.]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFanSuccessorClub Context triple: [Runcorn F.C. Halton, hasFanSuccessorClub, Runcorn Linnets F.C.]
-
A.
hasSuccessorClubName
Indicates that one club’s name is followed or replaced by another club’s name, typically due to succession or rebranding.
-
B.
successorClubPlaysIn
Indicates that the club which succeeds another club participates in a specified league or competition.
-
C.
notableSuccessorClub
Indicates that one club is widely recognized as the prominent successor or continuation of another club.
-
D.
successorClubCountry
Indicates that one club is the successor of another club within the same country, typically following reformation, relocation, or legal/organizational continuity.
-
E.
successorClubLocation
Indicates that the location specified is where the successor club of a previous sports or organizational club is based.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490209c881908ec0241476715f15 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd2cf39b0c8190811b8a6fa9410560 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd2ad8dd988190a9899701ba00d917 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:14 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd2cf29f808190856ab1d43a51d5c7 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:23 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:27 a.m.