Triple

T3210476
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject BMW Z4 E67265 entity
Predicate secondGenerationBodyStyle P46206 FINISHED
Object roadster LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: roadster | Statement: [BMW Z4, secondGenerationBodyStyle, roadster]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: secondGenerationBodyStyle
Context triple: [BMW Z4, secondGenerationBodyStyle, roadster]
  • A. secondGeneration
    Indicates that one entity belongs to the second generation relative to another, such as being the child of a first-generation member in a lineage or sequence.
  • B. secondGenerationEnd
    Indicates the point in time or event at which the second generation of a lineage, process, or system concludes.
  • C. secondGenerationEngineOption
    Indicates that an entity offers or is associated with a second-generation version of an engine as an available option.
  • D. secondGenerationName
    Indicates that the object is the name given to the second generation derived from the subject.
  • E. secondGenerationPlatform
    Indicates that an entity is a second-generation version of a platform, typically representing an updated or improved iteration of an earlier platform.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad858ac36c81909962589cd277d6e2 completed March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adaab886c48190b72e36d0ac855ffe completed March 8, 2026, 4:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad9e09b83881908801d79c3d9254f9 completed March 8, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ada0f9259c8190afbc5ad0fa55436b completed March 8, 2026, 4:16 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:07 p.m.