Triple
T32096389
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lady of the Golden Wood |
E819731
|
entity |
| Predicate | holderAllies |
P136406
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fellowship of the Ring |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fellowship of the Ring | Statement: [Lady of the Golden Wood, holderAllies, Fellowship of the Ring]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: holderAllies Context triple: [Lady of the Golden Wood, holderAllies, Fellowship of the Ring]
-
A.
alliesOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity is in a cooperative, supportive, or mutually beneficial alliance with another entity.
-
B.
alliesIncluded
Indicates that the specified set or group explicitly includes one or more allied entities as members.
-
C.
laterAlliesWith
Indicates that two entities become allies at a later time, after not being allied initially.
-
D.
alliesInWar
Indicates that two or more parties are cooperating as allies on the same side in a specific war or armed conflict.
-
E.
majorAllies
Indicates that the entities are principal or primary allies, signifying a strong, significant, and mutually supportive alliance between them.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34901106881908ea893ad504a08be |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6db6af1d88190989810182354d60f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6d82d068c8190940a3200ed760e38 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:07 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:26 a.m.