Triple
T32088000
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Roman sestertius |
E819500
|
entity |
| Predicate | declineInSizeAndQuality |
P35483
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 3rd century AD |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 3rd century AD | Statement: [Roman sestertius, declineInSizeAndQuality, 3rd century AD]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: declineInSizeAndQuality Context triple: [Roman sestertius, declineInSizeAndQuality, 3rd century AD]
-
A.
declineIn
Indicates a relationship where one entity experiences a decrease or reduction in the level, amount, or intensity of another entity over time.
-
B.
decline
chosen
Indicates a decrease or reduction in the level, amount, quality, or intensity of something over time.
-
C.
declineCharacterization
Indicates that an entity rejects or refuses a particular description, label, or portrayal applied to it.
-
D.
decliningAs
Indicates that one entity is decreasing in value, intensity, or importance relative to another over time.
-
E.
movementDecline
Indicates a reduction or worsening in the extent, frequency, or effectiveness of movement or mobility over time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349004b2481908ce2e50af0d579a8 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b58d7e5081909718343bc2a900db |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b3a7bdb481908d16a32f49e38c2c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m.