Triple

T32087987
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Roman sestertius E819500 entity
Predicate inscriptionsOftenInclude P51076 FINISHED
Object emperor’s name LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: emperor’s name | Statement: [Roman sestertius, inscriptionsOftenInclude, emperor’s name]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inscriptionsOftenInclude
Context triple: [Roman sestertius, inscriptionsOftenInclude, emperor’s name]
  • A. oftenDepictedWithInscription
    Indicates that the subject is frequently shown or represented together with a written inscription.
  • B. materialTypicallyInscribedOn
    Indicates the material that is most commonly used as the surface or medium on which something is inscribed.
  • C. mentionedInInscription chosen
    Indicates that an entity is referenced or named within a specific inscription or inscribed text.
  • D. commonlyInscribedIn
    Indicates that something is typically written, carved, or engraved onto a particular surface, object, or medium.
  • E. notableInscriptionBy
    Indicates that an inscription of particular note or significance on an entity was created, authored, or carved by a specified agent.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349004b2481908ce2e50af0d579a8 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6bbbef7a88190b0affdec1d41c1e0 completed May 3, 2026, 3:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6ba6cef208190bc5cd43d96127004 completed May 3, 2026, 3:01 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m.