Triple
T32080115
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Belgian sovereign airspace |
E819270
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalControl |
P193845
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Belgian state |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Belgian state | Statement: [Belgian sovereign airspace, hasLegalControl, Belgian state]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalControl Context triple: [Belgian sovereign airspace, hasLegalControl, Belgian state]
-
A.
hasLegalRight
Indicates that an entity possesses an officially recognized legal entitlement or permission to perform an action or hold a claim regarding another entity.
-
B.
hasLegalAuthorityFrom
Indicates that one entity possesses formal legal power, rights, or authorization that originates from or is granted by another entity.
-
C.
hasLegalForceIn
Indicates that something (such as a law, regulation, or agreement) is legally valid, binding, and enforceable within a specified jurisdiction or context.
-
D.
hasLegalForceAs
Indicates that one thing possesses the binding legal effect or validity in the capacity or role of another specified thing.
-
E.
hasLegalSubject
Indicates that an entity serves as the legal subject (e.g., rights-holder or obligated party) in a legal relationship or context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348ff8ef88190931c08ba530a36bc |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd57ba740c8190bd1d40166fccccb7 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd55ee82b881908a639da3a41b3af6 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:18 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd57b9cdec81908536c4159e375931 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:24 a.m.