Triple
T32070650
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lipit-Ishtar |
E819001
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalCodePreceded |
P198014
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Code of Hammurabi |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Code of Hammurabi | Statement: [Lipit-Ishtar, legalCodePreceded, Code of Hammurabi]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCodePreceded Context triple: [Lipit-Ishtar, legalCodePreceded, Code of Hammurabi]
-
A.
legalPrecedentFrom
Indicates that a legal decision, ruling, or principle is derived from, based on, or justified by an earlier legal case or authority.
-
B.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
-
C.
legalCodePromulgatedBy
Indicates that a specific legal code was formally issued or enacted by a particular authority or governing body.
-
D.
legalCodeName
Indicates that one entity is the official legal code designation or name assigned to another entity within a legal or regulatory system.
-
E.
legalCodeType
Indicates the specific category or classification of a legal code that applies to an entity or situation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348fecc088190af1470afe5a969f0 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fec25f0fc48190b87ab1f9cd1eb0de |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fec079a770819098df7cc3049df954 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:04 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fec25e3d708190be27135c57b189a5 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:13 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:23 a.m.