Triple

T32062358
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject MPEG-4 CELP E818777 entity
Predicate codingParadigm P173171 FINISHED
Object analysis-by-synthesis coding LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: analysis-by-synthesis coding | Statement: [MPEG-4 CELP, codingParadigm, analysis-by-synthesis coding]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: codingParadigm
Context triple: [MPEG-4 CELP, codingParadigm, analysis-by-synthesis coding]
  • A. softwareParadigm
    Indicates that a piece of software or a programming language follows or is based on a particular programming paradigm or style of development.
  • B. programming
    Indicates that an entity writes, develops, or modifies software or code, typically using a programming language to create or control computer programs.
  • C. programmingBy
    Indicates that one entity is created, implemented, or developed through the act of programming performed by another entity.
  • D. programDesign
    Indicates the relationship in which an entity is responsible for creating, planning, or structuring the overall design of a program or system.
  • E. programmingConcept
    Indicates a relationship where something is classified as or associated with a specific concept used in programming or software development.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348fdacec8190b9f74375ca3b2094 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6b4f638908190957f64096c07535f completed May 3, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6b154b3dc819087115f5f63f7b00f completed May 3, 2026, 2:22 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6b267b90c8190807208cadce5ae8d completed May 3, 2026, 2:26 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:22 a.m.