Triple
T32052121
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Insurance Act 1996 |
E818517
|
entity |
| Predicate | repealScope |
P76477
|
FINISHED |
| Object | conventional insurance business framework |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conventional insurance business framework | Statement: [Insurance Act 1996, repealScope, conventional insurance business framework]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: repealScope Context triple: [Insurance Act 1996, repealScope, conventional insurance business framework]
-
A.
repealedFor
Indicates that one legal rule, act, or provision has been revoked or annulled specifically in favor of, or as a consequence of, another.
-
B.
repealEffect
chosen
Indicates that one legal act or decision nullifies, cancels, or removes the force or applicability of another.
-
C.
canRepeal
Indicates that one entity has the authority or power to revoke, annul, or cancel a rule, decision, or action established by another entity.
-
D.
repealMentionedIn
Indicates that a repeal action or event is referenced or discussed within a particular document, statement, or context.
-
E.
repealed
Indicates that a law, rule, or regulation has been officially revoked or annulled so that it no longer has legal effect.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348fdacec8190b9f74375ca3b2094 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b4ca85188190b4f7ab81498a3d86 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b154b3dc819087115f5f63f7b00f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:22 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:20 a.m.