Triple

T32025320
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Anand Variation E817801 entity
Predicate hasECOCode P174436 FINISHED
Object D43 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: D43 | Statement: [Anand Variation, hasECOCode, D43]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasECOCode
Context triple: [Anand Variation, hasECOCode, D43]
  • A. hasIneCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific INE (national statistics or education) code that identifies it in an official registry.
  • B. hasFeatureCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific feature identifier or code that characterizes one of its properties or attributes.
  • C. hasICBCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific ICB (Industry Classification Benchmark) code that classifies its industry or sector.
  • D. hasINSEECODE
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific INSEE code, identifying it within the French national statistical and administrative system.
  • E. hasESODesignation
    Indicates that an entity is assigned a specific designation or identifier by the European Southern Observatory (ESO).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348fb04e4819081f4eab040ed7959 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6c2451e108190a73ccfdc99203d55 completed May 3, 2026, 3:34 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6bd25bed08190befcabd3a41ffadf completed May 3, 2026, 3:12 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6c1b666188190ac43c3011a7df048 completed May 3, 2026, 3:32 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:17 a.m.