Triple

T31993273
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Treaty of Paris (1857) E816924 entity
Predicate reaffirmedInfluenceOf P173098 FINISHED
Object British influence in Persia LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: British influence in Persia | Statement: [Treaty of Paris (1857), reaffirmedInfluenceOf, British influence in Persia]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reaffirmedInfluenceOf
Context triple: [Treaty of Paris (1857), reaffirmedInfluenceOf, British influence in Persia]
  • A. influencedIn
    Indicates that one entity had an effect on or shaped another entity within a specific context, domain, or setting.
  • B. incorporatesInfluence
    Indicates that one entity integrates or absorbs the influence, ideas, or characteristics of another into itself.
  • C. hasSignificantInfluenceIn
    Indicates that one entity exerts a substantial impact or shaping effect on another entity within a particular domain, context, or outcome.
  • D. influenced
    Indicates that one entity has affected, shaped, or altered another entity’s state, behavior, or characteristics.
  • E. influentialFrom
    Indicates that one entity has exerted influence on another, contributing to or shaping the latter’s ideas, behavior, or development.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348f8002081909a3588758ba94afb completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6b3badf8481909377856a516a982b completed May 3, 2026, 2:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6b151ad008190836c1bcdec503ce2 completed May 3, 2026, 2:22 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6b21da77081908c5c015c4606d344 completed May 3, 2026, 2:25 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:13 a.m.