Triple
T31978247
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Will Traynor |
E816504
|
entity |
| Predicate | backstoryAccidentResult |
P34334
|
FINISHED |
| Object | paralysis from the neck down |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: paralysis from the neck down | Statement: [Will Traynor, backstoryAccidentResult, paralysis from the neck down]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: backstoryAccidentResult Context triple: [Will Traynor, backstoryAccidentResult, paralysis from the neck down]
-
A.
resultOfAccident
chosen
Indicates that something exists or occurs as a consequence or outcome of an accident.
-
B.
involvedInAccident
Indicates that an entity participated in, was affected by, or was otherwise a party to a specific accident or collision event.
-
C.
hasAccidentAt
Indicates that an accident involving a subject occurs at a specific location or time.
-
D.
causedAccident
Indicates that one entity is responsible for bringing about or initiating an accident involving another entity or situation.
-
E.
accident
Indicates an unintended, unforeseen event or mishap occurring, often resulting in damage, injury, or disruption.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348f6a3008190bfb59ca695fd68e2 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b34672f08190bd219f937ce6b1dd |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:30 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b151ad008190836c1bcdec503ce2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:22 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:11 a.m.