Triple
T31974521
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Malerkotla |
E816411
|
entity |
| Predicate | administrativeUpgrade |
P173344
|
FINISHED |
| Object | made district headquarters of Malerkotla district |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: made district headquarters of Malerkotla district | Statement: [Malerkotla, administrativeUpgrade, made district headquarters of Malerkotla district]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: administrativeUpgrade Context triple: [Malerkotla, administrativeUpgrade, made district headquarters of Malerkotla district]
-
A.
upgradeType
Indicates the specific kind or category of improvement or enhancement applied to an entity relative to its previous state.
-
B.
administrativelyUpgradedFrom
chosen
Indicates that one entity has been raised to a higher status, level, or category as a direct result of an administrative decision based on or derived from another entity.
-
C.
upgradeContext
Indicates that an entity changes or enhances the operational or situational parameters under which another entity functions or is interpreted.
-
D.
upgradeStatus
Indicates the current state or progress of an upgrade process applied to an entity.
-
E.
upgradingAgency
Indicates that one entity is responsible for improving, modernizing, or enhancing another entity, typically by providing an upgraded version or higher level of service.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348f6a3008190bfb59ca695fd68e2 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd37b695c88190855801626f91c4cd |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:09 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd374cccf08190a230e87164af5938 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:11 a.m.